Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bruce W Forgan's avatar

I agree the merger between NZMS and NIWA has some positives. Though the current system in separation of organisational aims has worked well in Australia with the Bureau or Met and CSIRO Atmospheric Research etc. There are downsides in putting the activities under one director/leader - e.g. having a coal/oil/rock scientist taking the reins of an atmosphere/water agency and cutting network size and traceability, and spending the majority of money on largely ignorant contractors, under government instruction, and achieving nothing and giving little if any importance to the climate record; a bit like having an anti-vaccine advocate being in charge of the health agency - but thinking person wouldn't do that. Would they?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts