Hi Richard, I am convinced that our climate has changed and will continue to change but not convinced that greenhouse gas models accurately mimic the cause-effect interactions of all greenhouse gas sources and sinks and the quantities of different contributions, natural and manmade. In particular, arborists and botanists argue that the main contribution to climate change is massive destruction of natural rain forests, wetlands, natural bush and grasslands to make way for commercial farming and grazing. They argue that climate change models published or referenced by IPCC scientists seriously minimize this contribution because research on the part played by photosynthesis and bacteria is lacking and subsequent scientific data for this factor have not been correctly quantified. Can you comment?
Hi Richard, I am convinced that our climate has changed and will continue to change but not convinced that greenhouse gas models accurately mimic the cause-effect interactions of all greenhouse gas sources and sinks and the quantities of different contributions, natural and manmade. In particular, arborists and botanists argue that the main contribution to climate change is massive destruction of natural rain forests, wetlands, natural bush and grasslands to make way for commercial farming and grazing. They argue that climate change models published or referenced by IPCC scientists seriously minimize this contribution because research on the part played by photosynthesis and bacteria is lacking and subsequent scientific data for this factor have not been correctly quantified. Can you comment?